On 3 Nov 2000, David Hodgkinson wrote: > > In my tests, a modern version of mod_proxy (serving from cache) was faster > > than Squid on Linux. > > Really? Cool. What about taking memory usage into account? Well, Squid is kind of a memory hog and mod_proxy has been extremely light and well-behaved, even under heavy load. I would encourage others to try benchmarking it for themselves, but I currently see no reason to use Squid over mod_proxy. - Perrin
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor G.W. Haywood
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor David Hodgkinson
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor Leslie Mikesell
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor Gunther Birznieks
- HTTP Mod_Perl mini-server Nigel Hamilton
- Re: HTTP Mod_Perl mini-server Matt Sergeant
- Re: HTTP Mod_Perl mini-server David Hodgkinson
- Re: HTTP Mod_Perl mini-server Perrin Harkins
- Re: HTTP Mod_Perl mini-server David Hodgkinson
- Re: HTTP Mod_Perl mini-server Perrin Harkins
- Re: HTTP Mod_Perl mini-server Vivek Khera
- Re: HTTP Mod_Perl mini-server Perrin Harkins
- [ NOW OT ] Re: HTTP Mod_Perl mini-serv... Greg Cope
- Re: HTTP Mod_Perl mini-server Greg Stark
- Re: HTTP Mod_Perl mini-server spam
- Re: HTTP Mod_Perl mini-server Gunther Birznieks
- Re: HTTP Mod_Perl mini-server G.W. Haywood
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor Matt Sergeant
- Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor Gunther Birznieks