Jonathan M. Hollin wrote: > Er, that's not strictly true. Outlook handles encrypted and/or signed > email as well as any other client. Outlook displays the signed email > with a unique icon to identify it as such. The attachment contains the > actual PGP info (in case you want to see it). I think that's fair > enough isn't it? > > I don't know about Outlook Express though (which is a completely > different mailer). > Outlook Express handles S/MIME, but OpenPGP multipart/signed messages confuse it.
- Re: email attachments; was modperl growth Thomas Eibner
- Re: email attachments; was modperl growth Jorge Godoy
- RE: email attachments; was modperl gro... stevea
- [OT] email attachments - Win32 email r... Rod Butcher
- Re: [OT] email attachments - Win3... Jorge Godoy
- Re: [OT] email attachments - ... Drew Taylor
- RE: [OT] email attachments - ... Jonathan M. Hollin
- Re: [OT] email attachments - ... Mike808
- RE: email attachments; was modperl gro... Jonathan M. Hollin
- RE: email attachments; was modper... Brett W. McCoy
- Re: [OT] email attachments - Win3... Jeremy Howard
- Re: [OT] email attachments - Win32 ema... Rod Butcher
- Re: [OT] email attachments - Win3... Erich L. Markert
- Re: modperl growth Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: modperl growth Robin Berjon
- Re: modperl growth ___cliff rayman___
- Re: modperl growth Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: modperl growth Dave Rolsky
- Re: modperl growth Dave Hodgkinson
- [OT] RE: modperl growth Jonathan M. Hollin
- Re: [OT] RE: modperl growth Andrew Ho