Hi Perrin,
first of all please excuse my late answer - lots of things in mind to
care about, as I'm hopefully close to releasing the 0.2 version of the
serverpage implementation (and besides I urgently need a new job, too).
But thank you for your presice statement, that is exactly what I needed,
and you helped me a lot. I think that it'll be a consice offer to the
programmer if I declare 'redirect', 'moved', and 'forward' to be events
on which enclosing handlers have to react approximately. Which means
that a 'redirect' should lead to a 301 response, a 'moved' to a 302, and
a 'forward' to whatever. But these are in fact not of the server page's
concerns. Would you agree with this approach?
regards
M
Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Martin Haase-Thomas wrote:
>
>> forwarding is a term that i borrowed from the JSP concept - which i'm
>> currently trying to implement in perl.
>
>
> JSP forward is directly equivalent to an internal redirect. It's just
> an include that doesn't return. In short, it's a GOTO statement.
> Thank you Sun.
>
> - Perrin
>
>
--
"Constant shallowness leads to evil."
-------------------------------------------------------
Martin Haase-Thomas | Tel.: +49 30 43730-558
Software Development | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
