>>>>> On 22 Jul 2002 10:26:32 -0500, David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
DD> I've seen a lot of comments which seem to me to say that a static DD> mod_perl is the "only way to go". I've been using mod_perl as DSO for more than one year (or even maybe two) without any problems on FreeBSD/Linux/Intel. My understanding is that there was some problems in the past and there are still some issues on some platforms but Linux/Intel platform is "safe". DD> But Redhat ships it as a DSO. DD> Now, on the one hand, I wouldn't just automatically assume that Redhat DD> knew what they were doing. I would not trust RedHat to much to do right thing with Perl. They are know to produce broken mod_perl packages in the past for example. DD> [..snip..] -- Ilya Martynov (http://martynov.org/)
