On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Josh Chamas wrote: > This is interesting. I should look into upgrading to perl 5.8 on > these tests & see what difference there may be. > > You might also see if it makes a difference if you run the tests for > a long enough time. I run them at least 60 seconds for these benchmarks > which may make a difference.
I ran the Mason 2000 test for 60 seconds and it only used about 20MB. > I think that is how Gerald achieves his low memory footprints generally > in Embperl, since he is doing most of his stuff in C it seems, and still > offering all the advanced features we have in the other application frameworks. It might be worth trying to implement a few parts of Mason in C, particularly the Buffer class, though I'm not really sure I'm the one to do it, given my weak (and without honor) C skills. -dave /*================== www.urth.org we await the New Sun ==================*/
