I started out with apache1.x. It didn't make sense using it, since apache2 was built to work with window's native environment, according to my understanding of the documentation. Plus, I read that apache1.x doesn't serve concurrent requests on windows. Doesn't that defeat a large part of what a web server (and mod_perl) is supposed to do? Thanks for the feedback.
--- Randy Kobes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Paul Simon wrote: > > > Is it worth installing apache 1.x and mod_perl 1.x > on > > windows if apache2/mod_perl2/perl5.8 run on > windows? > > I guess it depends on what one is using it for ... > For a > development/learning system, the performance > enhancements with > apache2/modperl2 probably outweigh the disadvantages > of using the > more stable/tested apache1/modperl1 combination. But > for a > production system, it may be non-trivial to upgrade; > in > particular, many Apache::* modules may need either > mod_perl-2's > compatibility mode or some (small, or perhaps large) > changes to > work with mod_perl-2. > > -- > best regards, > randy kobes > > >
