Hi, You know I was all ready on my dev box to start messing around with apache2, when we had a major evil thing happen on our fancy server. So my dev box had to become our server. And because I have not had any personal experence with apache 2, I converted everthing back to 1.x on the dev box.
But you are right of course, I should not just assume because of hearsay that Apache2 will be faster. But between the threading, and the file cache module I *hope* it is faster :) Here is one kind of old thing I found on google: http://www.zend.com/lists/php-dev/200202/msg01675.html They are focused on PHP, but it seems like there might be some problems with the DSO only stuff. Weird that it is not easier to find stuf, I would have expected millions of hits on google for this. I will definatly will work on a better test with static and mod_perl once we get our fancy server back and post it to the list. But I can't believe someone on this list hasn't done that already. Thanks, Eric At 06:09 PM 1/21/03 +1100, Stas Bekman wrote: >Perrin Harkins wrote: >> Eric Frazier wrote: >> >>> On that note, how about just using Apache2 for the proxy front end, and >>> mod_perl /apache 1.x for the back end? I have wanted to try to avoid the >>> thttpd stuff for images and from what I have heard about apache2 it can >>> handle static pages a lot faster than the 1.x did. >> >> >> You really should be able to get more than enough performance out of 1.x >> for static files, unless you are using very old hardware. We used a >> slim 1.x build with mod_proxy, mod_ssl, and mod_rewrite for all of our >> static files at eToys and it ran like a champ. It's true that both >> thttpd and apache 2 have better performance, > >Where did you see the benchmarks showing that Apache 2.0 has a better >performance than 1.3? Apache 2.0 should scale better when threads are used (on >platforms where threads are faster than processes) and it's definitely a must >for win32, but I haven't seen any numbers other than some reports to the >httpd-dev list, so I don't know. Also Apache 2.0 provides features like >filters, which were almost impossible with 1.3, though how things get slowed >down when these are used is a question. Please notice that I'm not saying that >2.0 is slower, I'm just asking to see the numbers ;) > >__________________________________________________________________ >Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker >http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com >http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com > (250) 655 - 9513 (PST Time Zone) "Inquiry is fatal to certainty." -- Will Durant
