Hi Randal, On 11 Jun 2003, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> Am I crazy for suggesting that DSO doesn't really gain you much...? 'Sfunny you should say that... > Also, has anyone gotten experience with AddModule mod_perl but keeping > the front-end's mod_perl tasks to a minimum, and therefore the memory > footprint very small? Never had to worry about it a great deal, I usually just throw RAM or boxes at it. Maybe you could have a look at Squid or something? 73, Ged. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Ged Haywood wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > > > I wonder if this will affect anything else, especially other > > things that require DSO support. ? > > Have you got the Eagle Book? You need > > --enable-module=so > > in your configure arguments to put mod_so into Apache, mod_so allows > Apache to load shared objects. > > > What does --enable-shared=max imply to Apache... > > make as much as possible as shared objects, the idea being to make the > resulting binary smaller. It won't save any memory if you run it with > tons of modules loaded, so it's probably more trouble than it's worth. > Which is my opinion of DSO generally. I always build static if I can. >
