On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 17:24:37 -0800, Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Feel free to cut-n-paste or mangle as you see fit. Here is an alternative
>> way of putting it:
>>
>> When building mod_perl 1.99 on HP-UX for PA-RISC architecture 11.00/11.11,using
>> the HP ANSI C compiler, please make sure you have installed patches
>> PHSS_29484 and PHSS_29485.
>>
>> Is that easier to understand?
>
>I'm not an HP-UX user, so I'm not the one to judge whether the wording is good
>or not, that's why I've asked you to formulate it the best way you think of
>;). Earlier you've mentioned versions 11.00/11.11, are they important?
I guess. :)
> When building mod_perl 1.99 on HP-UX for PA-RISC architecture,
> version 11.00/11.11, using
Hmm, make that:
When building mod_perl 1.99 on HP-UX 11 for PA-RISC architecture,
using
> the HP ANSI C compiler, please make sure you have installed patches
> PHSS_29484 and PHSS_29485.
The patches are only available for HP-UX 11.xx, so the version is
relevant. I don't have access to a box running anything earlier than
11.00, so I don't know if mod_perl 1.99_11 would work there at all (when
compiled with the HP C compiler). But then, these patches are neither
used nor needed by GCC.
Cheers,
-Jan
--
Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
