On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 14:05, Stas Bekman wrote: > Ged Haywood wrote: > > > > I see your experience with the -er- people at P5P was similar to mine. > > That's very untrue, guys. p5p cares a lot for mod_perl and helps a lot to fix > things so that mod_perl will be happy. Not once a major release was delayed > because of problems with mod_perl. I wish httpd-dev cared about mod_perl just > a tiny fraction of what p5p does.
There is a general attitude to posters on that list, we all know it. I don't think anyone meant to say they didn't care about mp but rather that owning up to problems in perl itself is often low on the priority list. Eg, broken select(). > The issue with ithreads support/maintenance is different: At the moment the > ithreads package has no maintainer, so any fixes that you see at all are > spotty. Arthur Bergman has left to work on Ponie (perl5 on parrot > http://www.poniecode.org/) and noone has stepped up to replace him. No one mentioned this during my posts. > So if someone feels like picking up an important sub-project, by all means do > so. It requires understanding of threads, XS and Perl guts. Well, that would be the problem... XS + Perl Guts. Talk about arcane. -- Richard F. Rebel [EMAIL PROTECTED] t. 212.239.0000
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
