It was Wednesday, February 25, 2004 when Dave Rolsky took the soap box, saying: : On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Casey West wrote: : : > of work for the maintainer in working through the mailing list archives : : Or maintainer_s_. Why not set up an SF project for this? Then you and : Enrico can both do work on it. There's no reason a Perl module needs one : and only one maintainer.
Whatever Jeffery wants. I've not been so presumptuous to think that he likes the idea of me working on his code at all, thus the generics. I really hate SourceForge anyway, from experience. If that's what folks want, and Jeffery is okay with me (us, him, whoever) going ahead with it, then that is what will happen. I'm fine with conceeding that point. Basically, though, there should be one release manager. My interpretation of Enrico's post was that he's willing to work on the project, but not maintain it. Maybe I read too much into it. Casey West -- Usenet is like Tetris for people who still remember how to read. -- Button from the Computer Museum, Boston, MA -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
