Thanks, Stas! On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 02:51, Stas Bekman wrote: > > Looks good to me. IMHO I'd spend the little possible time on the history. > When you have only a 45min, as an attendee I'd rather be interested in the > present and may be a little bit about the future, but past is past... :)
I fully agree with your view on history. It was an initial idea to give a hand to the mod_perl's main stream by the clear numerical example of how good the technology (mod_per) is for successful further development. On the other hand this part (sufficiently detailed in the text of the proposal) somehow supports the idea of a "New Open Source Paradigm", that from my point of view decreases the chance for the proposal to be rejected (again;-). However, I do not expect to spend a lot of time on this during the session. My approximate time-line is supposed to include: some 20% - compression basics with examples and dynamical features; some 10% - how good is Apache::Dynagzip on the top of the mod_perl; some 50% - what is on the top of the Apache::Dynagzip that makes life of ISPs (and their clients) easier; + brief overview of Internet Banking features and the problem of the "rich content on every page" for content providers. the rest of the time -- some 20%, I hope to spend on prospective implementations of dynamic data compression and hope to initiate a discussion around this subject. Any additional suggestions? Thanks, Slava -- http://www.lastmileisp.com/
