-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stas Bekman wrote:

| Take a look at t/apache/content_length_header.t that's where you
| can see that httpd 2.1 has changed behavior.

True. Search'n-replacing of "have_min_apache_version(2.1)" with "1"
cures the problem.

| What's confusing is that your subject says Apache 1.3.26,

Sorry yet again, wrong package (of course). And subject line changed.

| whereas your report says Apache 2.0.52, whereas the error indicates
|  that you really run Apache 2.1.x. [...] Dominique, did you build
| Apache by yourself?

No indeed. This is apache2-mpm-prefork 2.0.52-3 from Debian testing,
not the latest version in testing either. I cannot readily upgrade
right now (apt-get says it's willing to install 2.0.53-5, but only if
I give it permission to wipe out the rest of my system first :-) , but
I'll try and recompile the .deb from its source and see if the problem
goes away.

| Is it possible that you have Apache 2.0.x with some special patches
|  from 2.1.x applied to it? My guess is that this is the case. In
| which case there is nothing we can do about it, since you aren't
| running a proper Apache 2.0.x but some sort of hybrid.
|
If Debian testing turns out to have this problem, I think that the
test should at least be skipped on that distro, otherwise I probably
won't be the last one to report this :-).

Anyway, thanks a lot for your support.

- --

Dominique QUATRAVAUX                           Ingénieur senior
01 44 42 00 08                                 IDEALX

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCKK37MJAKAU3mjcsRAuEuAKCv4uoZcDa/COeBSW+UqncdbKoGyACgothQ
T6rDiDs5fUC7MfWSESVyrF8=
=Qnqh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Reply via email to