On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:07:36 -0500, Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > | Is it possible that you have Apache 2.0.x with some special patches > > | from 2.1.x applied to it? My guess is that this is the case. In > > | which case there is nothing we can do about it, since you aren't > > | running a proper Apache 2.0.x but some sort of hybrid. > > | > > If Debian testing turns out to have this problem, I think that the > > test should at least be skipped on that distro, otherwise I probably > > won't be the last one to report this :-). > > No. > > 1) We can't skip the test just based on the fact that it's debian, since > there will be other people who install a real Apache 2.0.x and not a > mutant debian package, in which case it should not be skipped.
This is caused by a patch that the Debian version applies. I've filed a bug report with them to remove it. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=298143 The patch came from here: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/server/protocol.c?root=Apache&r1=1.150&r2=1.151 The patch was later reverted: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?root=Apache-SVN&rev=110141&view=rev Dominique, you could also just remove that patch from your debian source package: debian/patches/035_HEAD_Content-Length_Fix_From_CVS And rebuild it. Contact me off-list if you need assistance with this before the Debian package is fixed.