Anton van Straaten wrote: > Carl Johnstone wrote: > >>> I think a great first-place to start for advocacy is to work with the >>> various linux/bsd/*nix distributions out there to make sure that they >>> have a modern, compatible version of mod_perl 2. As a user, I don't >>> want to maintain my own perl/mod_perl build tree - I want my distro to >>> do the right thing. Perhaps a first-step in the advocacy movement is >>> to maintain a "distro compatibility list" for mod_perl 2 on >>> perl.apache.org, so that it's not such a black-art in determining >>> whether mod_perl/Apache::* packages are up-to-date or whether there are >>> timebombs waiting to ambush new users. >> >> Sounds like a good idea, and if we point people in the right direction to >> get updated versions/backports for their distro that might help with the >> rest. > > Speaking of which, can anyone point me to a place where I can get a > prebuilt mod_perl later than 1.99_12 for Fedora Core 1?
Fresh from the oven, built: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/4/SRPMS/mod_perl-2.0.1-1.fc4.src.rpm On an up-to-date FC1 box: http://people.apache.org/~gozer/mp2/rpms/fc1/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Philippe M. Chiasson m/gozer\@(apache|cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/ GPG KeyID : 88C3A5A5 http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/ F9BF E0C2 480E 7680 1AE5 3631 CB32 A107 88C3A5A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
