Enno, you might want to try applying this patch: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37145
I had a problem similar to yours and this fixed it. Eric. On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 06:02:22PM +0200, Enno wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 May 2006, Thomas Hilbig wrote: > > > > > > > --- Enno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Let me guess, they are using apache 2.0.55 as > > > proxy... > > > mod_proxy in 2.0.55 has problems with properly > > > delivering chunked > > > encoding. > > > The CGI.pm error sounds very familiar to the one I > > > had with apache 2.0.55 > > > proxy. > > > > > > 2.0.54 and 2.2.2 dont have the chunked encoding > > > prob. > > > > > > Enno > > > > > > > Just so I'm clear on this, you think the customers > > that are having the problem are using a 2.0.55-based > > proxy and my end is simply waiting for the rest of the > > data? I am assuming the one client is using a > > Symantec proxy because of the HTTP_VIA env variable -- > > but I don't know if that product is based on apache or > > not. > > > > HTTP_VIA="1.0 WEBSENSE01SA, 1.0 Symantec_Web_Security > > (3.0.0.52)" > > hmm, I wouldnt go so far to say symantec is selling apache > as a proxy... but it is possible that the symantec proxy has > the same bug... > > also, please note that I located that bug in systems with reverse > 2.0.55 proxies, using ssl on both ends. > > > Is there a third-party URL that I can ask my (big > > company) users to test against to prove to them it is > > not at my (small company) end? > > any form where you can post a large amount of kbs (eg 30kb) > of data will do just fine. (or even upload a 100kb file using a form) > > > Would I see the problem at my end if I used something > > like tcpdump to capture the packets? What am I > > looking for? > > > > Tom > > I'd guess so, I never had to go through the troubles as I > was able to locate the problem quite quickly without it. > > Enno >
