If the signature is on and you don't see it, chances are it's not loaded
properly.
Beginner wrote:
Lot's of replies, thanx.
On 1 Mar 2007 at 10:50, Foo JH wrote:
To be really sure, turn on the server signature and see what your telnet
trick gives you.
amend in your http.conf:
ServerSignature on
ServerSignature is already on:
httpd.conf:ServerSignature On
Can we draw any conclusions from this?
Beginner wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit confused.
If I do:
telnet localhost 80
....
I get:
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:53:29 GMT
Server: Apache/2.0.52 (Fedora) <- Note no mod_perl here
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 3931
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
...
I have a number of handler configured like so:
<Location /calendar>
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler MY::calendar
Order...
</Location>
These work fine and use the following pragmas;
package MY::calendar;
use Apache2::Const qw(OK DECLINED NOT_FOUND);
use APR::Table;
use Apache2::RequestUtil ();
use strict;
use Calendar::Simple;
use Date::Calc qw(Month_to_Text);
use CGI;
use Template;
use warnings;
$| = 1;
sub handler {
...
The issue with SOAP::Lite is interesting. During the install you get
a list of transports;
...
Standalone HTTP server [*] HTTP::Daemon [ yes ]
Apache/mod_perl server [ ] Apache [ no ]
FastCGI server [ ] FCGI [ no ]
POP3 server [ ] MIME::Parser [ no ]
...
I'm not sure if the formating will show it here but SOAP::Lite
doesn't see mod_perl installed. However is does install as does
SOAP::Apache so presumbly I can use in the same way I do with my
other modules.
Still I have the feeling that my installation is not standard and the
mis-match in version is a concern.
Would any one recommend a course of action? Should I remove the
binary RPMs that my package manager installed and install from
source?
Thanx,
Dp.
