Le duodi 22 brumaire, an CCXVIII, Perrin Harkins a écrit : > That's good enough for most applications, and the "nothing to see > here" requests can be handled very quickly.
For what I have in mind, the actual content is rather small so the overhead of the empty requests is huge. > If you really need to use Comet, the common approach is a non-blocking > server architecture. That is what I used for my proof-of-concept server. > If you want to use mod_perl for it, you can read > about the approach Stas used here: > lxxi.org/files/spamcon07/Bekman-SMTP_Multiplexing.pdf That seems like a rather strange design, but I will look into it. Thanks for the pointer. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
