On Thursday, January 27, 2011 20:44:57 Alexander Aparzev wrote:
> using Apache/2.2.9 (itk MPM)
Just a guess, has anyone ever tested itk-MPM?
However, perhaps it's only a matter of bad timing. pnotes2.t is one of mine, I
think. It looks as follows:
for my $i (1..12) {
t_client_log_warn_is_expected();
t_start_error_log_watch;
$u="$url?$i"; $ok=GET_BODY $u;
select undef, undef, undef, 0.2; # give it time to write the logfile
ok t_cmp scalar(grep {
/pnotes are destroyed after cleanup passed/;
} t_finish_error_log_watch), 1, $u;
}
You see the 200ms pause? Maybe that's too short for itk.
Try the following:
# clean the log
>t/logs/error_log
# run the test
t/TEST -verbose t/modperl/pnotes2.t
# now check the log and see if it contains 12 lines of 'pnotes are ...'
((12==$(grep 'pnotes are destroyed after cleanup passed' t/logs/error_log | wc
-l))) && echo ok
The reason for the test is a bug in a former mp2 version where the refcount of
the pnotes hash might become wrong:
$ svn log -r584380 t/response/TestModperl/pnotes2.pm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r584380 | gozer | 2007-10-13 08:48:14 +0200 (Sat, 13 Oct 2007) | 8 lines
Don't increase the refcnt of the pnotes HV* twice, we
will leak it.
Submitted-By: Torsten Foertsch <torsten.foert...@gmx.net>
Message-Id: <200710111518.18560.torsten.foert...@gmx.net>
Reviewed-By: gozer
Torsten Förtsch
--
Need professional modperl support? Hire me! (http://foertsch.name)
Like fantasy? http://kabatinte.net
