Thanks. It is nice to know not only what, but also why.

-----Original Message-----
From: Trung Tran-Duc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ralf S. Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, October 20, 1998 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: Patch faild on WINNT4.0


>On Tue, 20 Oct 1998 13:43:04 GMT,
>  Ralf S. Engelschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> In article <> you wrote:
>>
>> > Yes. The beta version are  suposed to work on NT.  I found the problem
was
>> > in the pathing program.  I found another port of GNU patch (2.1) and it
>> > worked.  Now I have it build on NT 4.0 (apache 1.3.3 and mod_ssl 2.1b6)
>> > with a few warning messages.  I don't know how serious these warning
are.
>> > But I'll find out soon.
>>
>> FYI: I used patch 2.5 from CygWin32's B19 package. Trung used a native
>> compiled patch 2.5.
>
>I use a Win32 port of patch 2.5 avail. from NTEmacs website
>
>http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/voelker/ntemacs/contrib/patch-2.5.zip
>
>This version has troubles with LF-only lines in a patchfile. You can
>
>a) either convert LF's in ssl.patch/apache.patch to CR-LF's before
>running configure.bat
>
>b) or modify configure.bat to add the switch --binary for the patch
>utility.
>
>-trung
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
>Official Support Mailing List               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Automated List Manager                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to