On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Martin Kraemer wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 10, 1998 at 08:03:54PM +0300, Khimenko Victor wrote:
> > May be while Ralf is busy with documentation things someone could take a look
> > on subj. This is just "working demo", but it's working enough to be usable as
> > replacement for mod_ssl 2.1b8 ! PLEASE, take a look and make suggestions. IMO
> 
> I like it. Can I use it in my own projects?
> 
Oops. Completely forgot about copyright problem :-(( Add the following in
the ap_hook.c and use as permitted:
-- cut --
/* ====================================================================
 * Copyright (c) 1998 Khimenko Victor. All rights reserved.
 *
 * Choose one of two licenses:
 *
 * ====================================================================
 *
 * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
 * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
 * are met:
 *
 * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
 *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. 
 *
 * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
 *    notice, this list of conditions and the following
 *    disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials
 *    provided with the distribution.
 *
 * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
 *    software must display the following acknowledgment:
 *    "This product includes software developed by 
 *     Khimenko Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for use in the
 *     mod_ssl project (http://www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/)."
 *     except when used in mod_ssl-derived or Apache-derived products.
 *
 * 4. The names "mod_ssl" must not be used to endorse or promote
 *    products derived from this software without prior written
 *    permission. For written permission, please contact
 *    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *
 * 5. Products derived from this software may not be called "mod_ssl"
 *    nor may "mod_ssl" appear in their names without prior
 *    written permission of Ralf S. Engelschall.
 *
 * 6. Redistributions of any form whatsoever must retain the following
 *    acknowledgment:
 *    "This product includes software developed by 
 *     Khimenko Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for use in the
 *     mod_ssl project (http://www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/)."
 *
 * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY KHIMENKO VICTOR ``AS IS'' AND ANY
 * EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
 * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
 * PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL KHIMENKO VICTOR OR
 * HIS CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
 * SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT
 * NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
 * LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
 * HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT,
 * STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
 * ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED
 * OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
 * ====================================================================
 *
 * This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
 * modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public
 * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
 * version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 *
 * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
 * Library General Public License (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lgpl.html)
 * for more details.
 * =====================================================================
 */
-- cut --

> Pro's:
> *   Strong prototyping & type checking
>     (on a "by function" basis). => No need to pre-define the "allowed" signatures.
> 
> *   Elegant automatic wrapping of the called functions into inlined functions
>     (prerequisite for the strong typechecking)
> 
> Con's:
> *   Should be run thru indent to conform to Ralf's coding style
>     (no offense intended ;-)
> 
> Questions:
> * In the following code snippet, we create a static ap_hook_start_##hook_name
>   pointer "per module" (i.e., for each module trat includes the header).
>   Shouldn't it be a global list that's shared between modules? And if yes, you
>   can't initialize it to NULL.
>   +static struct ap_hook_struct_##hook_name {                                   \
>   +  ap_hook_func_##hook_name hook_addr;                                        \
>   +  struct ap_hook_struct_##hook_name* next;                                   \
>   +} *ap_hook_start_##hook_name = NULL;                                         \
> 
No, it's not possible. Consider situation where mod_ssl and mod_perl are
hooked, for example (DSO case). We could not put variable in mod_ssl
since mod_perl should be loadable without mod_ssl and by the same
reason we could not put this variable in mod_perl. So we are forced to
put this variable in Apache core! And this is clearly unappropriate... But
current design is not ok for situation where you have two modules with a
lot of source files in each. May be we should have ap_define_global to
make definitions in .h file (with "extern __inline__"  if inline is
supported and with just plain extern if inline is not supported) and
ap_define_realize to make instance for variable (and functions). There are
should be one more parameter (module name) to avoid name collizions, of
course... IMO this version should COMPLEMENT ap_define, not replace it...
What do you think ?

> 
> >  PLEASE, take a look... It was sended three times to list
> > but looks like noone even notice it :-((
> 
> Yes, I saw you sent it but was too busy to have a closer look. Sorry if I'm too
> late with my response. 

This is FIRST I'm got so far (except of Olaf's responce with noise
about .bz2 :-)

> Did you send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] too?

Yes. Three times.

> In the Headers I received, only the developers who received the 2.1b9-SNAP
> package are mentioned.
> 
It was sent in monday very early morning. Since I'm got no responces
(ANY responces) for two days I'm sent one more letter to developers...

______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to SSLeay (mod_ssl)   www.engelschall.com/sw/mod_ssl/
Official Support Mailing List               [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to