* Mark Stosberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-24 15:46]: > > HTML::DragDrop::Javascript > > HTML::DragAndDrop::Javascript > > Is there a way to implement Drag and Drop with HTML /without/ > using JavaScript? I suspect not. Thus, I think it could be > appropriate to drop 'Javascript' from the name
I'm thinking the same, though it then seems wrong to me. Maybe HTML::Dynamic::DragDrop? Or maybe (the acronym soup for dinner version) HTML::DHTML::DragDrop, which is a tad shorter. > Including 'And' in the name is how people usually refer to the > technique. However, for a module name I think it may be clear > enough to exclude the word 'And' in favor of a shorter name > that is 'good enough'. Well, actually it's really "drag'n'drop", but DragNDrop looks more than a little ugly, DragnDrop looks awkward. Heh, it *could* actually be ::Drag'N'Drop! (Which is the same as Drag::N::Drop. C.f. the "D'oh" module.) But, that's not probably a good idea for "real" code. DragAndDrop looks and sounds a little awkward.. probably DragDrop then. Regards, -- Aristotle "If you can't laugh at yourself, you don't take life seriously enough."
