On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:21:04 +0200 Johan Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * lacks predictable behaviour > I fail to see your point here. Options are handled from left to > right, which makes perfect sense.
I have watched the on-line slide. The slide said: ============ * lacks predictable behaviour * users are too unpredictable GetOptions( 'foo' => \$foo, 'no-foo' => sub {$foo = 0}, ); print "$foo\n"; $ a_program --foo --no-foo 0 $ a_program --no-foo --foo 1 ============ To Eric, I'm not against new modules at all. I'm also new here. But I really can't see the point here. I though that is the desired behavior, isn't it? What do you think is "right" on that example? Croak? Return 1 on both cases? Return 0 on both cases? -- imacat ^_*' [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key: http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.txt Tavern IMACAT's http://www.imacat.idv.tw/ Woman's Voice http://www.wov.idv.tw/ TLUG List Manager http://www.linux.org.tw/mailman/listinfo/tlug
pgpJDTGeGTTa5.pgp
Description: PGP signature