On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 12:32:48PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote: > > I think the real value that most people find in the ratings is not > the quantitative data but the qualitative written reviews. Making > that more integrated with various other search/browse sites might be > cool, but even then it might help turn CPAN from a collaborative > sharing space into a competitive, bashing, NIH space, which would be > too bad.
Perhaps at least the number of reviews could be factored into searches, or the at least the presence of /any/ reviews. I always find it easier to evaluate a module when I can see what others think about it as well. Mark