On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 03:46:42PM -0500, Lincoln Stein wrote:
> I'd prefer MPEG:: to Audio::MP3:: because of the name length issues.
> I'm sure we're all going down the road to hell... %-)
We are. But I'd be happy on the road with the AudioMP3:: signpost.
The AudioWAV:: etc names would also be fine by me.
Tim.
> Lincoln
>
>
> Chris Nandor writes:
> > At 20.32 +0000 2000.02.22, Tim Bunce wrote:
> > >On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 03:24:40PM -0500, Lincoln Stein wrote:
> > >> I'd prefer MP3:: myself because MPEG makes people think first of
> > >> video.
> > >
> > >Go for MP3::* then and let others follow... :-)
> > >
> > >Tim.
> > >
> > >> Any chance Chris has thought about changing his module's name
> > >> to MP3::Info?
> >
> > I am not sure if MP3:: is a great base name. What about AIFF::, MOV::,
> > WAV::, etc.?
> >
> > Maybe Audio::MP3::Info ... ? I am not keen on changing the name, but I
> > wouldn't mind if it were a good name. :) I dunno. Orwant, are any of us
> > treading down the path to hell here? :D
> >
> > --
> > Chris Nandor mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pudge.net/
> > %PGPKey = ('B76E72AD', [1024, '0824090B CE73CA10 1FF77F13 8180B6B6'])
>
> --
> ========================================================================
> Lincoln D. Stein Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cold Spring Harbor, NY
> ========================================================================
