At 19.48 -0500 2000.02.22, Jon Orwant wrote:
>Chris writes:
>> I am not sure if MP3:: is a great base name.  What about AIFF::, MOV::,
>> WAV::, etc.?
>>
>> Maybe Audio::MP3::Info ... ?  I am not keen on changing the name, but I
>> wouldn't mind if it were a good name.  :)  I dunno.  Orwant, are any of us
>> treading down the path to hell here?  :D
>
>I think MP3:: is the best name.  It doesn't score well on the Ontology
>axis, but its stratospheric scores on the Brevity and Mindshare axes
>more than compensate.

Yeah, that's what I was sorta thinking.  I just hate to screw with that
damned ontology axis.  But I see three votes for MP3::, so I would not be
opposed to changing MPEG::MP3Info to MP3::Info.  Please advise me on how
this should be handled; it is a fairly well-used module, and such a change
will surely cause confusion and pain.

-- 
Chris Nandor          mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]         http://pudge.net/
%PGPKey = ('B76E72AD', [1024, '0824090B CE73CA10  1FF77F13 8180B6B6'])

Reply via email to