At 19.48 -0500 2000.02.22, Jon Orwant wrote:
>Chris writes:
>> I am not sure if MP3:: is a great base name. What about AIFF::, MOV::,
>> WAV::, etc.?
>>
>> Maybe Audio::MP3::Info ... ? I am not keen on changing the name, but I
>> wouldn't mind if it were a good name. :) I dunno. Orwant, are any of us
>> treading down the path to hell here? :D
>
>I think MP3:: is the best name. It doesn't score well on the Ontology
>axis, but its stratospheric scores on the Brevity and Mindshare axes
>more than compensate.
Yeah, that's what I was sorta thinking. I just hate to screw with that
damned ontology axis. But I see three votes for MP3::, so I would not be
opposed to changing MPEG::MP3Info to MP3::Info. Please advise me on how
this should be handled; it is a fairly well-used module, and such a change
will surely cause confusion and pain.
--
Chris Nandor mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pudge.net/
%PGPKey = ('B76E72AD', [1024, '0824090B CE73CA10 1FF77F13 8180B6B6'])
