At 10.49 -0400 2000.05.01, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
>Does anyone know?
>
>----- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----
>
>Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:41:23 +0100
>Subject: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 03:17:54PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
>> > > That's why I suggested AXKIT. Isn't AXKIT two sylables?
>> > >
>> > > Apache::AXKIT::...
>> > >
>> > > Apache::XML::Kit::...
>> >
>> > OK, I think I might go with AxKit. Thanks for your help.
>>
>> Chop, chop. :-)
>>
>> So I think the big question is whether we can convince you to keep the
>> Apache:: prefix...
>
>Well... maybe. ;-)
>
>It should be possible to distribute it as AxKit-X.XX.tar.gz, but have it
>install as Apache::AxKit::*, right?
Yes. You can have a distribution called, for example, MailTools or libnet
or TimeDate without a MailTools.pm or libnet.pm or TimeDate.pm (Hi,
Graham!).
--
Chris Nandor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://pudge.net/
Andover.Net | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://slashcode.com/
