On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 03:17:54PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> > That's why I suggested AXKIT. Isn't AXKIT two sylables?
> >
> > Apache::AXKIT::...
> >
> > Apache::XML::Kit::...
>
> OK, I think I might go with AxKit. Thanks for your help.
Chop, chop. :-)
So I think the big question is whether we can convince you to keep the
Apache:: prefix...
--
"Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity."
via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Chris Nandor
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Matt Sergeant
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Matt Sergeant
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Chris Nandor
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Matt Sergeant
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Matt Sergeant
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Tim Bunce
- Re: Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Joshua N Pritikin
- Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Matt Sergeant
- Re: Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Chris Nandor
- Re: Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Matt Sergeant
- Re: Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Graham Barr
- Re: Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Graham Barr
