At 14.40 +0100 2000.05.01, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>Right, fixing it is always possible (except the module is already in use -
>so that's another issue). However lets take a look at CPAN's root
>directory:
>
>ARS
>ACE
>B
>BBDB
>BnP
>CIPP
>Cdk
>Cz
>DCE
>DWH_File
>ERG
>FFI
>LSF
>LWP
>MOP
>NNML
>PDL
>POE
>PV
>Sx
>WDDX
>
>Phew - that's an awful lot of acronyms ;-)
>
>I know I'm stretching this a bit - the above is meant humorously, and I
>realise that a lot of the above will have been uploaded without a request
>to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but AXDTK is more of a product, than something that
>should be under the Apache::XML::* namespace. I guess that's my opinion,
>anyway.
1. Giving evidence of past sins isn't a good argument for the perpetuation
of the same sins. Not that all of the above are sins, beause some of them
aren't.
2. I don't know what a "product" is.
>As for being "widely known, standards, etc", well I hope to make the first
>one of those a reality in the near future with a number of articles in
>various publications. That's how a lot of the above got to be "widely
>known" too. Although some of the above are just simply named badly! ;-)
Yep.
--
Chris Nandor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://pudge.net/
Andover.Net | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://slashcode.com/
