Re: HTTP::Request::Form and TreeBuilder.pm (fwd)

[Paul J. Lucas]

On 8 Nov 2000, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:

> I wrote:
>  >    HTML_TreeC++ is not a valid identifier.
> 
> Cplusplus, C_plus_plus, Cxx, ...

        Too ugly.

> I wouldn't apply this rule to your project, but I also have considered
> HTML::Tree already taken by Sean although his module is really called
> HTML::TreeBuilder.

        So why doesn't his filename match?  It looks like the problem
        isn't really my problem after all.

> All I would suggest is to classify HTML::Tree deeper, maybe HTML::Tree::Cxx.

        That's the best suggestion I'ev heard so far; however, a
        subclass of Cxx is too ugly (never mind that the implementation
        langauge should not be part of the name).

        - Paul