Re: HTTP::Request::Form and TreeBuilder.pm (fwd)

[Paul J. Lucas]

On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:

> If time is the issue, you could have done it already in the time you've spent
> explaining why you don't want to.

        1. You underestimate the amount of work that needs to be done.

        2. Fine: I will get more and more terse in my replies.

> I am here to give my opinion on proper use of the CPAN.

        And I noted it.  Are we done yet?

> If you had taken more time up front to make sure your name was a good one --
> you admitted you knew about it and did it anyway

        I didn't take the time then for the same reason I don't want to
        take the time now: I have better things to do that to site
        around all day contriving names.

> We already did suggest other ones.

        I said "suggest /good/ ones."

> Every other incident I've seen where the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list said that a
> name is bad and should be changed, the parties involved complied, even if
> they disagreed, because that's the way things work.  I guess there has to be
> a first for everything.

        I guess /they/ have more spare time on their hands.  Lucky them.
        I'm simply too busy not to deal with this issue.

        Are we done yet?

        - Paul