>>>>> On Sat, 30 Dec 2000 17:54:38 -0500 (EST), Sam Tregar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I think MailPage is more accurate - the module requires the the target URL
> be an HTML page that is readable on the local filesystem. Calling it
> MailURL seems to imply that it can handle any URL anywhere on the web.
> Maybe CGI::Application::MailHTMLPage would be more accurate?
As I see no risk of a namespace clash all three suggestions sound OK
to me. MailURL would be the most generic but it should really not be
limited to static pages on the local filesystem. Maybe you will add
this functionality (it should be a matter of a few lines)?
--
andreas
