Yes. "5:00 pm" versus "5 minutes ago" is a huge difference.
Yes. I think you missed the point. The point was to provide nice "timestamps" in templates (or where ever) On Thursday, August 28, 2014 5:05:05 PM UTC+2, Stefan Adams wrote: > > > On Aug 28, 2014 9:50 AM, "Jan Henning Thorsen" <jan.henn...@thorsen.pm> > wrote: > > > > The big difference is that I got pretty ABSOLUTE time as a fallback, > while https://github.com/kraih/mojo/compare/time_in_words is used to > create pretty RELATIVE time. > > I understand the focus of your distinction now. "5:00 pm" versus "5 > minutes ago". Yes? > > Perhaps I missed it sri, I was curious what your motivation was for > supplying relative time such as "5 minutes ago". > > When I initially saw your commit I thought that you were interested in > showing some core logging in the debugger that something happened 5 minutes > ago or such. > > Anyway... Sorry to beat a dead horse. Just curious. > > > On Thursday, August 28, 2014 4:46:03 PM UTC+2, Stefan Adams wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Jan Henning Thorsen < > jan.henn...@thorsen.pm> wrote: > >>> > >>> Stefan: That is indeed a Mojolicious template. What I meant is that I > want to provide a pretty absolute time (not like the ironman webpage) and > then I replace that on the client side with whatever "data-timestamp" > holds. time() = something computers (javascript) can understand and > pretty_absolute_time() is something humans can read. > >>> > >>> Another thing is that pretty_absolute_time() makes also more sense if > you plan to print the webpage. Therefor I wouldn't replace the <span> tag, > but rather hide it by default on "media screen" and show it on "media > print". > >> > >> > >> Thanks for the response, Jan. I think this makes sense, however, as I > understand it you're still calling a Perl function to output pretty time / > cutesy dates -- the very function that Sri was proposing and that you were > suggesting isn't useful because you like to render it on the client > (javascript). But it sounds like you are still rendering cutesy dates on > the server. I'm not suggesting that this is sufficient cause to introduce > cutesy dates into Mojo core by any means, just trying to keep up with you > in the conversation and understand your response and rationale. Sorry for > my inability to understand better. :D > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Mojolicious" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to mojolicious+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > To post to this group, send email to mojolicious@googlegroups.com. > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mojolicious" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mojolicious+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to mojolicious@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
