> > > Monkey HTTP Server is currently under the LGPLv2 License and > > personally having a long-term open source background, i am seriously > > considering to move from LGPLv2 to BSD 3-clause license. > Maybe the decision is already made, but I would like to add my 2 cents > to the discussion. > > I understand the interest to move away from LGPLv2 to a permissive > license[0], I won't argue against this. But BSD 3-clause license may be > a too weak license and AFAIK it doesn't protect properly against > patents.
> I would like to suggest you to consider Apache License v2[1], it's a > wide accepted license in companies, so this should solve some of the > concerns of possible adopters of the stack. > > Its a valid point, just to get more details, which concerns may solve ?, indeed the question is: a company who is adopting Monkey technology, why do they would prefer APL over BSD ? regards, -- Eduardo Silva http://edsiper.linuxchile.cl http://monkey-project.com
_______________________________________________ Monkey mailing list [email protected] http://lists.monkey-project.com/listinfo/monkey
