On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 22:07 +0200, Zoltan Varga wrote: > Hi, > > [1] was already in SVN, I checked in [2], but why is [3] required ?
This bugreport we had in the Debian BTS [0] explains it. I am not sure though if that still applies to Mono 1.1.9.1 [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=262023;archive=yes -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL++++$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O---- M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
