Rodrigo Kumpera wrote: > These are shortcomings of the current AOT implementation of mono > that are easier to fix than implement a fast interpreter. Who said anything about fast?
I would value an interpreter not as a replacement for JIT in a full mono stack, but as a way to create a very small footprint runner for CLR code, with a really cut-down runtime. This would be competing more with a Lua usecase than anything else. James _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
