On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:39 PM, James Mansion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rodrigo Kumpera wrote: >> These are shortcomings of the current AOT implementation of mono >> that are easier to fix than implement a fast interpreter. > Who said anything about fast? > > I would value an interpreter not as a replacement for JIT in a full mono > stack, but as a way to create a very small footprint runner for CLR > code, with a really cut-down runtime. This would be competing more > with a Lua usecase than anything else.
Which is, I think, what the original author of the thread meant by referring to the Micro Framework... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Micro_Framework -- runs in 300kb, 70 classes, 420 methods, doesn't need an OS or a MMU... -- Michael Hutchinson http://mjhutchinson.com _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
