On 09/29/08 James Mansion wrote: > Rodrigo Kumpera wrote: > > These are shortcomings of the current AOT implementation of mono > > that are easier to fix than implement a fast interpreter. > Who said anything about fast?
The mono interpreter already operated on a different internal representation, not on IL code directly, so it's not jit-fast, but still not as slow as Rodrigo would imply with his message. The main issue is that a few people showed interest in bringing the intepreter back to life, saying it was important to them, but they never dedicated 1 man hour to the task (or if they did, they didn't share the code). So, if those people that claim an interpreter is importnat didn't dedicate 1 man hour, why should we? (Note I'm not pointing figers to anyone here, several people wanted an interpreter but were unwilling to spend anything on it, money, man hours or anything else except email postings:). lupus -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] debian/rules [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monkeys do it better _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
