In message <[email protected]> on Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:47:47 +0100, Ludovic Brenta <[email protected]> said:
ludovic> Richard Levitte <[email protected]> writes: ludovic> > Basically, it's a setup similar to 'monotone' and 'monotone-server' ludovic> > ludovic> > Perhaps the package names are poorly chosen. That could easily be ludovic> > changed, though. ludovic> ludovic> Yes, I think it would be a good idea to rename them to "usher" and ludovic> "usher-server". Hmmm, according to your policy, it would seem I shouldn't commit any new changes to org.debian.usher for now. Perhaps that wasn't exactly your intention, so should I create org.debian.usher.for-usher-1.0? Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte [email protected] http://richard.levitte.org/ "Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited!" -- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish _______________________________________________ Monotone-debian mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-debian
