Richard Levitte writes: > ludovic> Richard Levitte <[email protected]> writes: > ludovic> > Basically, it's a setup similar to 'monotone' and > ludovic> > 'monotone-server' > ludovic> > > ludovic> > Perhaps the package names are poorly chosen. That could > ludovic> > easily be changed, though. > ludovic> > ludovic> Yes, I think it would be a good idea to rename them to > ludovic> "usher" and "usher-server". > > Hmmm, according to your policy, it would seem I shouldn't commit any > new changes to org.debian.usher for now. Perhaps that wasn't exactly > your intention, so should I create org.debian.usher.for-usher-1.0?
No, the policy is in terms of the target release of Debian you want to upload to. If you intend to upload to unstable (after the freeze is lifted) then org.debian.usher is the appropriate branch. If you want to upload to experimental then the appropriate branch is org.debian.usher.experimental. However, there has been no upload of usher at all so far, so we could make an exception and allow uploads to experimental from the main branch, org.debian.usher. This obviates the need for any sub-branch. -- Ludovic Brenta. _______________________________________________ Monotone-debian mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-debian
