In message <[email protected]> on Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:25:33 +0100, Ludovic Brenta <[email protected]> said:
ludovic> Richard Levitte <[email protected]> writes: ludovic> > For consistency, I think a .experimental sub-branch is more ludovic> > appropriate. That way, there will be no need to rewrite or put more ludovic> > exceptions in the policy as well. That's the path I'll follow for ludovic> > now. If you have strong opinions against this, I can always change ludovic> > the branch cert before pushing (I will wait for your response before ludovic> > doing so). ludovic> ludovic> No strong opinion, OK for .experimental. Cool. ludovic> > What's the prognosis on when the freeze on unstable will be lifted, do ludovic> > you know? ludovic> ludovic> From http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ it seems the relase will ludovic> happen before end of January. But that is only my personal opinion; I ludovic> may be entirely wrong. Good... The reason I asked is that there's an effort to get monotone 1.0 released in Q1 2011, and it would be nice to be able to release it to Debian at the same time. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Monotone-debian mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-debian
