Am 28.04.2010 08:42, schrieb hend...@topoi.pooq.com: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 04:54:01PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: >> So, how about this? >> >> >> protocol://u...@server.host.name/path/to/database?include,include,-exclude,-exclude >> >> should work equally well for mtn (with usher), ssh, and file. Without >> usher, you just leave out the /path part. > > Does this mean that, with usher, it will now be mandatory to specify the > database explicitly? That usher will no longer be able to make > decisions based on the branch name(s) involved? And that, to a user, > usher-based monotones will look different from bare monotones?
No, this is merely an extension to usher (which iirc has already been partially implemented by Tim) to have a third way to pick a database for usher where DNS is not possible and branch pattern uniqueness might not always be given. Thomas. -- GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | tommyd3...@jabber.ccc.de | http://thomaskeller.biz Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
