http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback&userid=coolstuff159 Al Shevy, aka "coolstuff159" His negative feedback is now up to 7 (6 individuals in the past 30 days, including myself). When I checked this morning, he had made his feedback private again. I hope every member of MOPO would feel obligated to alert the community to a pattern of negative feedback and objectionable business practices like those Al is defending. This also applies to sellers who run into problem buyers.
Post Office delivery issues aside, Al still publicly insists that the poster he sold me was in "Fine" condition. I disagree, which is why I returned the poster to him. I believe that significant defects in the artwork, like water damage, large stains and bleed-throughs should be disclosed, regardless of the grading given overall. I accept that there is a level of subjectivity when grading posters, but isn't the disclosure of significant defects outside of normal wear and tear a standard which ethical individuals can agree on?? Click on the links to look at Al Shevy's original auction page/photo and the photos I took of the actual poster I received. Armed with this info and his eBay feedback ratings, I'm sure everyone can judge for themselves whether they're comfortable doing business with him. auction page: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=60332&item=7525124231 link to photos of the poster I received from Al Shevy: http://homepage.mac.com/dkuspa/PhotoAlbum11.html Yes, Al Shevy left a message for me the other night on my answering machine. But after being on the receiving end of a series of angry, profanity-laced emails, why would I subject myself to more abuse from him over the phone? As I replied to him via email, whatever he has to say he can say in an email. And frankly, for legal reasons, I'd prefer to have all communications from him in writing. -_David on 9/16/05 9:34 PM, Al Shevy at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm glad that you think that the POSTMASTER in LANSING knows what is > happening here in Tampa. So I guess you want to make it out that I made this > all up and is more of my DASTARDLY PLAN to defraud everybody. I guess the > photo copied MAGAZINE that they sent me that they OPENED and told me they > sent POSTAGE due because it was NOT MEDIA MAIL is all made up???I guess the > whole conversation that I had with the POSTMASTER about this is all a > flashback from all the acid I did years ago?????I guess the fact that I was > on the phone 4 hours yesterday trying to find out what happened to DAVID'S > packing that I sent is all BS also. I guess the fact that I tried to call > DAVID with no RESPONSE with the INFO I obtained is all BS also. I guess the > fact that I in FACT am trying to do the right thing here and I read this > nonsense is all the more reason why I should just shut up because like I > said it does not matter what I do SOME OF YOU FOLKS ARE > ........................................I'll stop there and let you use your > imagination. I'm sure you know where I was going. By the way DAVID sent THE > POSTER TO ME PRIORITY MAIL INSURED. It was delivered to my NEIGHBOR. It was > open when I received it.Not that that matters as I'm sure the POSTMASTER in > LANSING knows more about it then me. This response has been CENSORED by me > for the more DELICATE among you who have asked me NOT TO BE SO CANDID.I hope > this response meets with your approval. > Al > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU> > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 10:10 AM > Subject: Re: [MOPO] random inspection of a persons mail > > Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
