Time to Reboot America 
By
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/tho
maslfriedman/index.html?inline=nyt-per> THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

I had a bad day last Friday, but it was an all-too-typical day for America. 

It actually started well, on Kau Sai Chau, an island off Hong Kong, where I
stood on a rocky hilltop overlooking the South China Sea and talked to my
wife back in Maryland, static-free, using a friend's Chinese cellphone. A
few hours later, I took off from Hong Kong's ultramodern airport after
riding out there from downtown on a sleek high-speed train - with wireless
connectivity that was so good I was able to surf the Web the whole way on my
laptop.

Landing at Kennedy Airport from Hong Kong was, as I've argued before, like
going from the Jetsons to the Flintstones. The ugly, low-ceilinged arrival
hall was cramped, and using a luggage cart cost $3. (Couldn't we at least
supply foreign visitors with a free luggage cart, like other major airports
in the world?) As I looked around at this dingy room, it reminded of
somewhere I had been before. Then I remembered: It was the luggage hall in
the old Hong Kong Kai Tak Airport. It closed in 1998. 

The next day I went to Penn Station, where the escalators down to the tracks
are so narrow that they seem to have been designed before suitcases were
invented. The disgusting track-side platforms apparently have not been
cleaned since World War II. I took the Acela, America's sorry excuse for a
bullet train, from New York to Washington. Along the way, I tried to use my
cellphone to conduct an interview and my conversation was interrupted by
three dropped calls within one 15-minute span. 

All I could think to myself was: If we're so smart, why are other people
living so much better than us? What has become of our infrastructure, which
is so crucial to productivity? Back home, I was greeted by the news that
General Motors was being bailed out - that's the G.M. that Fortune magazine
just noted "lost more than $72 billion in the past four years, and yet you
can count on one hand the number of executives who have been reassigned or
lost their job."

My fellow Americans, we can't continue in this mode of "Dumb as we wanna
be." We've indulged ourselves for too long with tax cuts that we can't
afford, bailouts of auto companies that have become giant wealth-destruction
machines, energy prices that do not encourage investment in 21st-century
renewable power systems or efficient cars, public schools with no national
standards to prevent illiterates from graduating and immigration policies
that have our colleges educating the world's best scientists and engineers
and then, when these foreigners graduate, instead of stapling green cards to
their diplomas, we order them to go home and start companies to compete
against ours.

To top it off, we've fallen into a trend of diverting and rewarding the best
of our collective I.Q. to people doing financial engineering rather than
real engineering. These rocket scientists and engineers were designing
complex financial instruments to make money out of money - rather than
designing cars, phones, computers, teaching tools, Internet programs and
medical equipment that could improve the lives and productivity of millions.


For all these reasons, our present crisis is not just a financial meltdown
crying out for a cash injection. We are in much deeper trouble. In fact, we
as a country have become General Motors - as a result of our national drift.
Look in the mirror: G.M. is us.

That's why we don't just need a bailout. We need a reboot. We need a build
out. We need a buildup. We need a national makeover. That is why the next
few months are among the most important in U.S. history. Because of the
financial crisis, Barack Obama has the bipartisan support to spend $1
trillion in stimulus. But we must make certain that every bailout dollar,
which we're borrowing from our kids' future, is spent wisely. 

It has to go into training teachers, educating scientists and engineers,
paying for research and building the most productivity-enhancing
infrastructure - without building white elephants. Generally, I'd like to
see fewer government dollars shoveled out and more creative tax incentives
to stimulate the private sector to catalyze new industries and new markets.
If we allow this money to be spent on pork, it will be the end of us. 

America still has the right stuff to thrive. We still have the most
creative, diverse, innovative culture and open society - in a world where
the ability to imagine and generate new ideas with speed and to implement
them through global collaboration is the most important competitive
advantage. China may have great airports, but last week it went back to
censoring The New York Times and other Western news sites. Censorship
restricts your people's imaginations. That's really, really dumb. And that's
why for all our missteps, the 21st century is still up for grabs.

John Kennedy led us on a journey to discover the moon. Obama needs to lead
us on a journey to rediscover, rebuild and reinvent our own backyard. 

Merry Christmas! 

 

 Check out our shop video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-n2AznLA8o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCP7PaO-2tk
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCP7PaO-2tk&feature=related>
&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fojAZcbvL7E
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fojAZcbvL7E&feature=related>
&feature=related <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xPL8Ik037s> 

 <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xPL8Ik037s> 

jim episale
Unshredded Nostalgia
323 South main St. Route 9
Barnegat, N.J. 08005
800-872-9990 609-660-2626

Money back if not satisfied
MasterCard Visa Discover American Express 

 

  _____  

From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@sol03.american.edu] On Behalf Of Richard
Halegua Comic Art
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 2:43 PM
To: mop...@sol03.american.edu
Subject: Re: [MOPO] WAY OT: What drove Bernie Madoff


on Jan 20th, we're going to see a party like we haven't seen since 1776



At 11:23 AM 12/27/2008, you wrote:


Bruce, 

I agree with you about bonuses but also about HOW hey spend the bailout
money should be regulated.  Banks that didn't need the
bailout are getting hundreds of millions and they aren't using it to free up
credit practices.  Wall Street companies are giving
bonuses and paying dividends to Stockholders which means the Americans who
just lost their job will be payingoff those investors' 
dividends making it tougher to send their kids to college, etc.  This is a
bunch of b.s. and these guys are crooks in suits.  I don't care 
what 'party' you're for, unless we regulate this tax bailout, the 'party' is
over for the middle class and a Feudal system of Lords and 
Serfs and no middle class will be ushered in quickly.  And if History
serves, revolution follows.  

We have targeted tax breaks all throughout our system in order to stimulate
and encourage development of necessary resources for the 
good of our country.  And we regulate so much that it actually has become
starkly obvious that there's something amiss about the push to 
enact this handout before it could be 'conditioned' and Paulson has no
business in his position unless we want a puppet to distribute as this 
administration sees fit.  This was at it's heart, a money grab, this
administration has never been truly a Republican conservative administration
but it has had a cynical cronyism which has had nothing to do with what's
best for our bottom line.  At least we've seen fit to mandatorily 'fire' our

President automatically after 2 terms, now it appears as if there needs to
be term limits at these Wall Street Companies and Detroit as well.  
So I don't care that there were no strings attached to the first 'infusion'
of the bailout.  It's not like these companies have a lot of options so I
say 
fire the bums who got them into this with poor business practices, we can
change the 'deal' at any time because it's OUR ball and we can leave 
the playground at any time we like and not bail out any of them.  

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO REGULATE!

If, as the saying goes, 'What's best for business is best for America' then
just how's that workin' out for us?

Happy New Year!

Patrick

ps: as for your 'best and brightest' comment, I suppose you were being
sarcastic as no one has ever accused Bush or his folks of being either, much
less
both.


On Dec 27, 2008, at 10:05 AM, Bruce Hershenson wrote:



Remember when all our best and brightest politicians were screaming for the
Social Security money to be invested in the stock market so that our
retirees could enjoy those sensational returns Wall Street investors were
receiving?
 
Funny how no one is recommending that anymore. The funny part is that it
isn't a bad idea right NOW (with the market at the levels it is at). They
could set up a government fund called "Social Security Investments" and buy
chunks of the down and out giant companies that have been dragged down by
the credit crisis (like GE, GM, etc) and negotiate insanely good deals (like
the ones Warren Buffet always demands and gets) and then they should leave
those investments alone, and never sell them. Sure, some would work out
poorly, but overall, they would do quite well, as long as our country
eventually gets out of this mess. I see this as a win/win, because the
companies would get much needed cash infusions, and our future retirees
would have tangible investments instead of an IOU from the government.
 
Incidentally, all government bailouts should come with the proviso that no
bonuses be paid to executives until and unless the loans are repaid in full.
If the current execs don't like that, they should leave, and be replaced
(and it is hard to believe their replacements could do a worse job than they
did).
 
Bruce

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Patrick Michael Tupy <tellta...@mac.com>
wrote:


Am I the only one who thinks the 'bailout' was an end-around move to get
massive no strings attached 


tax-payer money into Wall Street after Bush failed to get the huge pool of
Social Security money 'privatized'


and into the coffers of Wall Street?



Patrick




On Dec 27, 2008, at 9:38 AM, Susan Heim wrote:




    I agree with you Bruce. What drove Bernie Madoff was greed. As for his
"investors", greed played a part there also, but there is nothing wrong with
making a profit. The fact that the promises made to these investors was so
great, that should have been their red flag. We would all be naive to
believe that there are not hundreds of Bernie Madoff's out there
manipulating at one level or another. Look at these companys that have been
and are being "bailed out" by our representatives who deemed they deserved
it. What happened to representing your constituents. I haven't spoken to one
person that would have approved these bailouts. In fact, most people I have
spoken to were and are adamantly against the bailouts.....and the bonuses
just keep on coming!! Some of these defense attorneys....blah, blah, blah,
all the way to the bank!!



  

     As for the SEC being asleep at the wheel, I think it was way more than
that and wonder how many pockets go padded to look the other way. As for
tying this to movie posters, that's where most of my investment is. I know
it, I can count on it, I have it insured and I trust most of the people
involved in it. So, that combination works for me. 



  

     Happy holidays everyone and I hope a better year coming for all.



  

Sue


www.hollywoodposterframes.com <http://www.hollywoodposterframes.com/>  




  _____  


Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:19:42 -0600


From: brucehershen...@gmail.com 


Subject: [MOPO] WAY OT: What drove Bernie Madoff


To: mop...@sol03.american.edu 




I looked at the cnn site just now and they have an article entitled, "What
drove Bernie Madoff".



  

It tells about what a brilliant man he is, and it concludes "Several people
who know Madoff say his saga reminds them of a Greek tragedy. Just like
Icarus who tried to fly too close to the sun, Bernie Madoff destroyed
himself in his unending quest for success and respect. Says Madoff's defense
attorney, 'this is a tragedy.'"



  

This really offends me. He was a crook who has done untold damage to tens of
thousands of people's lives (counting the many charitable groups he ruined)
and he did so in the worst possible way, by being a confidence man who won
their trust and then betraying it.



  

The people who were swindled have some responsibility, because they forgot
the old adage "if something seems too good to be true, it probably is", but
their doubts were overcome by their basic greed in wanting those great
returns, and in their belief that no one could be dishonest and operate on
that scale.



  

But this crook is the lowest of the low, and deserves no sympathy and is not
"tragic" by any measure.



  

What do YOU think?



  

Bruce



  

P.S. If one thinks this has nothing to do with movie posters, it seems an
absolute certainty there will be one or more movies made about this fraud,
and that opens the question of what title they will choose (maybe "The Death
of Icarus"?) and who will be chosen to play the lead role!


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
<http://www.filmfan.com/> 


___________________________________________________________________


How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List


Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu


In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L


The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
<http://www.filmfan.com/> 


___________________________________________________________________


How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List


Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu


In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L


The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.




Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
<http://www.filmfan.com/> 


___________________________________________________________________


How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List


Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu


In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L


The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.





Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to