Bruce,

I agree with you about bonuses but also about HOW hey spend the bailout money should be regulated. Banks that didn't need the bailout are getting hundreds of millions and they aren't using it to free up credit practices. Wall Street companies are giving bonuses and paying dividends to Stockholders which means the Americans who just lost their job will be payingoff those investors' dividends making it tougher to send their kids to college, etc. This is a bunch of b.s. and these guys are crooks in suits. I don't care what 'party' you're for, unless we regulate this tax bailout, the 'party' is over for the middle class and a Feudal system of Lords and Serfs and no middle class will be ushered in quickly. And if History serves, revolution follows.

We have targeted tax breaks all throughout our system in order to stimulate and encourage development of necessary resources for the good of our country. And we regulate so much that it actually has become starkly obvious that there's something amiss about the push to enact this handout before it could be 'conditioned' and Paulson has no business in his position unless we want a puppet to distribute as this administration sees fit. This was at it's heart, a money grab, this administration has never been truly a Republican conservative administration but it has had a cynical cronyism which has had nothing to do with what's best for our bottom line. At least we've seen fit to mandatorily 'fire' our President automatically after 2 terms, now it appears as if there needs to be term limits at these Wall Street Companies and Detroit as well. So I don't care that there were no strings attached to the first 'infusion' of the bailout. It's not like these companies have a lot of options so I say fire the bums who got them into this with poor business practices, we can change the 'deal' at any time because it's OUR ball and we can leave
the playground at any time we like and not bail out any of them.

IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO REGULATE!

If, as the saying goes, 'What's best for business is best for America' then just how's that workin' out for us?

Happy New Year!

Patrick

ps: as for your 'best and brightest' comment, I suppose you were being sarcastic as no one has ever accused Bush or his folks of being either, much less
both.


On Dec 27, 2008, at 10:05 AM, Bruce Hershenson wrote:

Remember when all our best and brightest politicians were screaming for the Social Security money to be invested in the stock market so that our retirees could enjoy those sensational returns Wall Street investors were receiving?

Funny how no one is recommending that anymore. The funny part is that it isn't a bad idea right NOW (with the market at the levels it is at). They could set up a government fund called "Social Security Investments" and buy chunks of the down and out giant companies that have been dragged down by the credit crisis (like GE, GM, etc) and negotiate insanely good deals (like the ones Warren Buffet always demands and gets) and then they should leave those investments alone, and never sell them. Sure, some would work out poorly, but overall, they would do quite well, as long as our country eventually gets out of this mess. I see this as a win/win, because the companies would get much needed cash infusions, and our future retirees would have tangible investments instead of an IOU from the government.

Incidentally, all government bailouts should come with the proviso that no bonuses be paid to executives until and unless the loans are repaid in full. If the current execs don't like that, they should leave, and be replaced (and it is hard to believe their replacements could do a worse job than they did).

Bruce

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Patrick Michael Tupy <tellta...@mac.com> wrote: Am I the only one who thinks the 'bailout' was an end-around move to get massive no strings attached tax-payer money into Wall Street after Bush failed to get the huge pool of Social Security money 'privatized'
and into the coffers of Wall Street?

Patrick


On Dec 27, 2008, at 9:38 AM, Susan Heim wrote:

I agree with you Bruce. What drove Bernie Madoff was greed. As for his "investors", greed played a part there also, but there is nothing wrong with making a profit. The fact that the promises made to these investors was so great, that should have been their red flag. We would all be naive to believe that there are not hundreds of Bernie Madoff's out there manipulating at one level or another. Look at these companys that have been and are being "bailed out" by our representatives who deemed they deserved it. What happened to representing your constituents. I haven't spoken to one person that would have approved these bailouts. In fact, most people I have spoken to were and are adamantly against the bailouts.....and the bonuses just keep on coming!! Some of these defense attorneys....blah, blah, blah, all the way to the bank!!

As for the SEC being asleep at the wheel, I think it was way more than that and wonder how many pockets go padded to look the other way. As for tying this to movie posters, that's where most of my investment is. I know it, I can count on it, I have it insured and I trust most of the people involved in it. So, that combination works for me.

     Happy holidays everyone and I hope a better year coming for all.

Sue
www.hollywoodposterframes.com



Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 10:19:42 -0600
From: brucehershen...@gmail.com
Subject: [MOPO] WAY OT: What drove Bernie Madoff
To: mop...@sol03.american.edu


I looked at the cnn site just now and they have an article entitled, "What drove Bernie Madoff".

It tells about what a brilliant man he is, and it concludes "Several people who know Madoff say his saga reminds them of a Greek tragedy. Just like Icarus who tried to fly too close to the sun, Bernie Madoff destroyed himself in his unending quest for success and respect. Says Madoff's defense attorney, 'this is a tragedy.'"

This really offends me. He was a crook who has done untold damage to tens of thousands of people's lives (counting the many charitable groups he ruined) and he did so in the worst possible way, by being a confidence man who won their trust and then betraying it.

The people who were swindled have some responsibility, because they forgot the old adage "if something seems too good to be true, it probably is", but their doubts were overcome by their basic greed in wanting those great returns, and in their belief that no one could be dishonest and operate on that scale.

But this crook is the lowest of the low, and deserves no sympathy and is not "tragic" by any measure.

What do YOU think?

Bruce

P.S. If one thinks this has nothing to do with movie posters, it seems an absolute certainty there will be one or more movies made about this fraud, and that opens the question of what title they will choose (maybe "The Death of Icarus"?) and who will be chosen to play the lead role!
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.




        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to