Yes, another MoPo member talking out his arse.

 

You obviously don't know Kerry and how convincing he could be.  He perfected it 
to an art.  Jim, more than anyone else should know this.
 


Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 20:12:45 -0500
From: ddilts...@mchsi.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] 3rd Party Grading Comes to Posters
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU




Jaime got a pass through legal system plain and simple. Its like saying, I was 
creating fake hundred dollar bills to see how good I could get them, but 
honestly judge, I never intended them to be used for real currency.
 
No one, and I mean NO ONE, would spend the time and effort it took to create 
these unless there is something to be gained in their bank account somewhere. 
Anyone that is supporting Jaime as having one pulled over on him is putting the 
shades on themselves plain and simple.
 
 
 
 



From: MoPo List [mailto:mop...@listserv.american.edu] On Behalf Of Sean 
Linkenback
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 8:02 PM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] 3rd Party Grading Comes to Posters



While Kerry may have been the mastermind, the "creator" - as in the actual 
creator of the fakes is/was Jaime.
 
The gun analogy is a poor one, as I agree that there is nothing inherently 
wrong with asking someone to make a fake (suspicious - yes, wrong - no), but 
once Jaime found out that the fakes were in the marketplace and being marketed 
as originals, he had a responsibility to not only inform the people who had 
sent him fakes for inspection/further work that they were fakes, but a moral 
obligation of declining to produce further copies. 
Yet he did neither of these things and continued to make them until the fraud 
became public knowledge.
 
So maybe a better analogy is:  if you were 100% certain that a person you sold 
a gun to last week committed murder with that gun, and that they also committed 
murder with a gun you sold them two weeks ago, would you sell them another gun 
when they came into your store this week and asked for one?
 
 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Todd Feiertag 
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] 3rd Party Grading Comes to Posters

Virtually everyone in the hobby was fooled...
 
Jim,
 
I WASN'T FOOLED!!
 
And there were a lot of other knowledgeable collectors who weren't fooled 
either.  Again, you don't know what you're talking about.  
 
If John was so concerned and wanted to "help the industry" so much, he 
shouldn't have charged $175. plus, to authenticate each item.  I guess you also 
think Carol Tincup was another person who was trying to "help the industry" 
when she charged you $350. an item.
 
Jim, there were many collectors who sent me posters and lobby cards to 
authenticate.  Do you know how much I charged them??  $00.00, ZERO, NADDA, 
NOTHING.  Now, you tell me, who's really trying to "help the industry" or help 
out collectors, John and Carol??
 
Yet, you still support the creator of this entire mess. 
 
I know you're referring to Jaime but the creator of this mess was your good 
buddy Kerry and Kerry alone.
 
Charges against Jaime were dropped by the court as there was no evidence to 
bring a case against him.
 
Again, I'll give you this analogy...
 
If I own a gun shop and sell someone a gun and they go out and kill 10 people, 
is the gun shop owner liable??  NO.  Is the gun manufacturer liable??  NO.
 
Guess who's liable??  The guy who decided to break the law and kill 10 people, 
that's who's responsible, not the gun shop owner and not the gun manufacturer.
 
How come you didn't bring a lawsuit against Anthony in New York??  After all, 
Anthony is the one who actually did the printing.  I haven't seen you mention 
anything about him??  If Jaime is responsible, Anthony should also be just as 
responsible.  
 
Jim, as much as you'd like the gun shop owner to be responsible for the deaths 
of those 10 people, he's not the one.
 
Differences aside...I feel real bad for you Jim, since your loss in this 
situation is by far the biggest and far worse than anybody elses and honestly, 
I hope that you eventually get every penny back.  I can also understand your 
frustration and how stressful this has been on you and your family losing so 
much money and I can also understand you want anyone that had anything to do 
with this held accountable and I don't blame you one bit.  I just hope that 
this gets resolved and resolved to your benefit 100%.  
 
Todd   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 


Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 18:25:11 -0400
From: jimgres...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] 3rd Party Grading Comes to Posters
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU



Todd what you aren't saying is that he repaired that Dracula Window card prior 
to this fake problem surfacing.  No one suspected anything.  All approaches 
changed when it was discovered the hobby had a bad problem.  Virtually everyone 
in the hobby was fooled, not just John.  And when awareness of the problem 
surfaced, John and others then took a different look at things.  Yet, you still 
support the creator of this entire mess.  It seems pretty ironic that on one 
hand you support the 100% creator of fakes, but hammer on the guy trying to 
help this industry.

Jim Gresham 
18501 Henry Ct. 
Ray, Mi 48096 
586 677-7669
Go to www.childrenofthenightbook.com






Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 18:17:47 -0400
From: toddfeier...@msn.com
Subject: Re: [MOPO] 3rd Party Grading Comes to Posters
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU




Not only did John Davis at Poster Mountain say a FAKE Dracula Window Card was 
real after he re-restored it, he also swore a Dracula REPRINT One Sheet was 
also real.
 
Those are two examples most people know about.  Curious to know how many other 
FAKES he also swore were real.  
 
On the other hand, since he is obviously no expert, I'm curious to know how 
many REAL posters and lobby cards he swore as being FAKE??
 
Just because someone restores posters, doesn't make them an expert in 
authenticating them.
 
In addition, just because someone has handled a lot of posters, doesn't make 
them an expert either.
 
Todd Feiertag
 
 


Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 22:06:24 +0100
From: evan...@blueyonder.co.uk
Subject: Re: [MOPO] 3rd Party Grading Comes to Posters
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

It is indeed interesting. 
And if they have the right skills and knowledge it could have helped if they 
started two years.


But, I still can't get over that someone seemingly had everything at their 
disposal and still missed one fake in particular.


Correct me if this is account is inaccurate, but if you strip the false front 
from a Window Card back, to improve and replace the back, and you've years of 
experience of handling paper, how can you miss it?


I'm not hinting anything untoward, I just still can't understand it.


And if they couldn't spot that one, what level of skills and knowledge are 
required for us to rely on anyone to prevent any possible next generation?


Cheers,
Richard







On 26 May 2010, at 21:46, Sean Linkenback wrote:


For a long time now, 3rd party grading has been rumored to be "just around the 
corner", "coming soon" and sometimes "never will happen".
 
Well that day is finally upon us for better or worse (though I can't help but 
wonder if it had been here even two years ago would collectors have saved 
literally millions of dollars and maybe the "Universal Horror Fakes" fiasco 
might have been over as soon as it started.)
 
CGC (Certified Grading Company - the people who have been grading comics for 
over a decade) has recently begun limited certification of lobby cards to test 
the market and the first examples will be offered at the upcoming Heritage 
Signature Auction in July.
Although no photos are on Heritage's site yet, there are two listings for 
complete lobby sets (Let It Be, and All The King's Men) that have been CGC 
graded/certified.
 
It will be very interesting to see how these are accepted in the marketplace.
 
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with 
Hotmail. Get busy. 
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with 
Hotmail. Get busy. 
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.



The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Get 
started. 
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
___________________________________________________________________
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

                                          
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with 
Hotmail. 
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5
         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to