Agreed. Give me a window card with the original theater imprint, and the poster goes from a nice bit of imagery to an iconic piece of American history. Stuff written on the back of posters...as long as it doesn't bleed through...often adds a bit of being in the that moment in time to the piece.
Greg Douglass
Toochis Morin wrote:
I love posters that have the worn look. If I wanted them to look perfectly new, I'd buy repros. Many of mine are framed with the fold lines, etc. I usually linenback and restore if the poster is in dire need to restoration.

Toochis

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Bruce Hershenson <brucehershen...@gmail.com>
*To:* MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
*Sent:* Sat, July 17, 2010 9:11:34 AM
*Subject:* Re: [MOPO] The Scandal-plus cut, pressed washed, starched & dried....

I actually had one of my employees suggest to me that we should "punch up" the images of items we sell, and I told him that we NEVER do that (he is new, or he would have already known that). Of course, there is no way to know if others feel the same way (at least until you get your package and compare the item you get to the image you saw).

Bruce

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Richard Evans <evan...@blueyonder.co.uk <mailto:evan...@blueyonder.co.uk>> wrote:

    I thought the This Gun for Hire went beyond strong colours and
    looked unflatteringly garish.
    Presumably not a result of restoration judging by the listing,
    but was it really actually that vibrant, or did the colour
    reproduction exacerbate it online?

    On 17 Jul 2010, at 16:44, Bruce Hershenson wrote:

    I personally agree with this. I didn't like the "make it look
    perfect" school of restoration even *BEFORE* the Haggard scandal
    broke.

    First, because the restorers were in effect hiding their
    restoration, making it impossible to see exactly what was done
    (and a long time pro like myself could spot some restoration that
    most amateurs would never see, creating a "fear of restoration"
    among many collectors).

    Second, because many of these items were *SO *restored that they
    looked almost like "recreations". I *LIKE *the items in my
    collection to show at least *SOME *signs of age, unless they are
    in truly mint unrestored condition, because that is part of the
    joy of owning an original, knowing that it survived all these
    years. If you want a perfect looking item, why not just get a
    reproduction? But don't take your "very good" condition and have
    someone make them look like new. If you *MUST *restore, why not
    simply do minimal restoration to the areas that most need it?

    Bruce

    On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:58 AM,
    glenndamato <glenndam...@earthlink.net
    <mailto:glenndam...@earthlink.net>> wrote:

        Regarding the Heritage auction: I do believe the fakes
        scandal hurt the hobby, plus many of the restored posters
        look like they were cut, bleached, washed, starched & dried.
        I'll take old Igor back anyday.......

                Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site
        at www.filmfan.com <http://www.filmfan.com>
___________________________________________________________________
                     How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

              Send a message addressed
        to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
        <mailto:lists...@listserv.american.edu>
                   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

           The author of this message is solely responsible for its
        content.


    Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
    <http://www.filmfan.com>

    ___________________________________________________________________

    How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

    Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
    <mailto:lists...@listserv.american.edu>

    In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.




Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com <http://www.filmfan.com>

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___________________________________________________________________
             How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
           In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to