Im curious what shipping others use.. I typically send priority mail... with delivery confirmation.. I put folded posters in some cardboard then wrap in foam..
If rolled i use a Yazoo tube either 2 inch, 3 inchor 4 inche.. i wrap in fom and kraft paper. for me it seems to cost 700 10,00 depending on where it goes.. overseas islike average 30.00 Unless someone demand 1st class then its like 15-8 but i warn the customer there is no good tracking and its slower. the priority also i can get the box supplie free.. otherwize a tub cost is average like 2 -3.00 and other materials you can have like 3-5 in materials If i get heavy boxes i use fed ex groundor priority flat rate I hope to sell some more posters on ebay soon Ihave some horror drive in movies stuff 60-70s I would appreciate some input from collectors and dealers so i can improve my service better. thanks Folks everyone have a good night > > >---- Original Message ---- >From: [email protected] >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [MOPO] 4 extra folds? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 extra >undisclosed folds >Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 22:08:41 -0400 > >>Are you kidding?????????? >>All this fuss over a $38 poster >> >>Burn it now. >> >>CJL >> >> >>In a message dated 10/7/2011 7:43:41 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >>[email protected] writes: >> >>been there, done that, "aint goin' back" >> >>seller told me he/she got this on consignment..............and >seller not >>willing. as i see it, seller charged 45 including shipping. i >think >>postage to me was about 7.00. >> >>this is not a high ticket item. >> >>thanks >> >> >> >>In a message dated 10/7/2011 7:40:00 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >>[email protected] writes: >> >>You sound like a martyr...saying you'll "accept your loss". If it >was me, >>I'd ask for a partial refund. >> >> >> >>In a message dated 10/7/2011 4:37:33 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, >>[email protected] writes: >> >>i am not dragging this out.............. i am accepting my loss. >> >>i am just answering question people on this site. >> >>had seller been more responsive initially, and more responsible, >MOPO >>never would have heard about this. >> >>this site got his to finally answer >> >> >>michael >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>In a message dated 10/7/2011 7:34:08 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >>[email protected] writes: >> >>Sheesh....why don't you just ask the dealer for a partial refund >and keep >>the damn poster. This isn't rocket science. So much whining and >>complaining. Either keep the poster or tell the seller you expect >him to pay your >>cost for shipping it back. He sounds like a reasonable person. >What's the >>problem here? Things like this happen on eBay all the time. You've >gotten >>solutions from a bunch of different sources, but it seems as if >you'd rather >>just sit there and complain..... >> >> >>In a message dated 10/7/2011 4:03:21 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, >>[email protected] writes: >> >>after the poster was folded with the studio folds, it was folded >>again...............hence 4 exta fold lines. but these fold lines >have lots and >>lots of crumpling around them............ >> >> >> >> >>In a message dated 10/7/2011 6:44:55 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >>[email protected] writes: >> >>how much in value could a $40 poster decrease? >> >>was this insert folded in quarters as normal, and then folded in >half >>again (about a 5" x 14" rectangle)? is that how it got 4 extra >folds? >>or are the extra folds just where it was originally folded and then > >>sloppily folded back creating an extra? >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: _Michael B_ (mailto:[email protected]) >>To: [email protected]_ >(mailto:[email protected]) >>Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 6:34 PM >>Subject: Re: [MOPO] 4 extra folds? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 extra >>undisclosed folds >> >> >>when i first wrote, i thought people might comment about the >decrease in >>value due to 4 extra folds. >> >>over the last year, i was outbid twice......once with a bidding >>war------on bruce's site for an insert. i recall, the poster >selling at bruce's site >>for about 130 amd 180. (and you know his pictures are clear and he >adds >>words when there are extra folds) >> >>a few months ago, an ebay seller...........very >honest------------listed >>the same insert for 69.99. he disclosed 4 extra folds. you can >also see >>the folds in the images. the poster never sold at 69.99. i would >have >>grabbed it at that price, had there been no extra folds. the >seller has >>re-listed the poster at a very, very low start price. KNOWING THE >DEFECT, which >>the seller disclosed both in words and photographs, this time will >sell. i >>will be a bidder. but i wouldn't want to bid, win, and then open a > >>package and be surprised. >> >>we bid based on condition. when condition is not disclosed, prices >get >>inflated. >> >>as to your questions rich------------i paid high for the >title......it did >>not sell for a long time. so people believing it was near mint as >i did, >>dint think it was a good value. now, with this defect, it is worth >a lot >>less................... and seller is not cooperating in the >return. i am >>about to just end it, take my loss........... >> >>michael >> >> >> >> >> >> >>In a message dated 10/7/2011 6:18:05 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >>[email protected] writes: >> >>John, I disagree >> >>if a seller has mis-described or not properly reported condition >issues >>that should be noted if not visible, then I believe (as I'm sure >does Bruce, >>Sean and most dealers) that I should be paying return shipping - >unless >>some other deal was worked out like a small discount, replacement >etc. >> >>the buyer might not have bid as much or at all if the condition was > >>properly described, so that would on my head, not my customer's. >> >>if a seller on ebay tells me he won't accept returns for instance >under >>any circumstances, I don't care if he has a Double Indemnity 1 >sheet up >>that's about to close for $1000. I'm not bidding, because I'm not >going to >>consider putting up with any bullshyte >> >>similarly, if the seller says I accept returns if I incorrectly >described, >>but you pay shipping and I will not refund your other shipping >either.. >>I'm telling that dealer to kiss my lily white a$$ and I'm taking my >dollars >>elsewhere >> >>If a buyer after receipt says "Hey, you didn't do anything wrong, >but I >>find that I don't like this piece as much as I thought I might and >I would >>like to return it", I happily take return, but shipping in neither >direction >>will be refunded. I will not take any other action against the >buyer. he >>may bid freely in the future. >> >>if the buyer after receipt says "you f*cking suck and I want to >return >>this".. well that gets back to the lily white thingy >> >>Rich >> >>At 03:05 PM 10/7/2011, JOHN REID Vintage Movie Memorabilia wrote: >> >>Just another point about this. The issue seems to be about whether >the >>seller should pay for return shipping. eBay actually requires all >sellers to >>specify a return policy and also to indicate who pays for the >poster to be >>sent back. Surely it should be just a case of checking the sellers >policy >>which is clearly displayed in the listing. If the listing says that >the >>seller won't pay for return shipping then they shouldnt be expected >to change >>their policy. >> >>----- Original Message ----- >> >>From: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>_Richard Halegua Comic Art_ (mailto:[email protected]) >> >>To: [email protected]_ >(mailto:[email protected]) >> >>Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2011 7:55 AM >> >>Subject: Re: [MOPO] 4 extra folds? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 extra >>undisclosed folds >> >> >>Michael >> >> >>are you telling me that the dealer wouldn't pay for your shipping >cost >> >> >>or >> >> >>that maybe he got irritated at you after your messages/MoPo and >told you >>to f*ck off? >> >> >>or >> >> >>are you saying you feel you got a good enough price in buying it >that you >>don't want to return it? >> >> >>It makes a world of difference which of these 3 situations is the >answer >> >> >>if the latter is the case Michael, then I don't see why you say you >were >>"burnt" or that you will "take a hit" >> >>if the latter is not the case, then something isn't right >> >> >>Rich >> >> >>At 02:42 PM 10/7/2011, Michael B wrote: >> >> >>not at all. >> >> >> >> >>it was never my intent to embarrass the mega-dealer-seller. my >posting >>was merely to get the seller to respond, if he were a MOPO member. >the >>picture of the poster on ebay looks near mint....even hard to see >the studio >>folds. >> >> >> >>i was burnt and disappointed in this transaction......... >> >> >> >>i repeat: the picture of the poster on ebay looks mint....even >hard to >>see the studio folds. ....no hint of extra fold on the >photo.......but >>offensive in person. >> >> >> >>looks like i will take a hit on this one, because when i sell it, i >will >>disclose the defects. >> >> >> >>easy for those who don't get slapped to say to the other to turn >the other >>cheek. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>michael >> >> >> >> >> >>In a message dated 10/7/2011 4:56:57 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >>[email protected] writes: >> >>Fascinating is all I can say. >> >>This buyer who complained so loudly has now gone completely silent >and >>turned his mute button on. Why? >> >>And with still no links to this incorrectly described (4 4 4 >folded) >>poster, and no response to those that questioned, criticized and >>commented on his premature outburst towards a seller who was/is >>willing to work with him-- speaks volumes about this individual's >own >>integrity and transparency. >> >>I see he also occasionally lists a number of posters for sale on >ebay, >>with every color in the rainbow used in the descriptive fonts >>(psychedelic trip?). Let's just hope that each and every flaw on >those >>posters have been accurately disclosed. I am willing to bet that >there >>are small imperfections that have not been seen and therefore, not > >>disclosed. >> >>And if someone found an undisclosed flaw and wanted to return a >>purchased poster to him, would this seller pay for return shipping > >>and/or take a price reduction decided by the unhappy buyer? >> >> >> >>-KL >> >> >> >> >>On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Michael B <[email protected]> >wrote: >>> when a poster is "not as described" or has undisclosed defects, >it >>should be >>> the seller that paye the return postage? >>> >>> i am waiting for the seller to confirm this. >>> >>> i was happy to see that the seller read my posting on MOPO, and >>responded, >>> but he needs to confirm that he will pay the return postage. >>> >>> michael >>> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at _www.filmfan.com_ >>(http://www.filmfan.com/) >>> >___________________________________________________________________ >How >>to >>> UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed >to: >>> [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: >SIGNOFF >> >>> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its >content. >> >>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at _www.filmfan.com_ >>(http://www.filmfan.com/) >>___________________________________________________________________ > >>How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List >> >>Send a message addressed to: [email protected] >>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L >> >>The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. >> >> >> >> >>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at _www.filmfan.com_ >>(http://www.filmfan.com/) >> >>___________________________________________________________________ >> >>How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List >> >>Send a message addressed to: [email protected] >> >>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L >> >>The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. >>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at _www.filmfan.com_ >>(http://www.filmfan.com/) >> >>___________________________________________________________________ >> >>How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List >> >>Send a message addressed to: [email protected] >> >>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L >> >>The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. >> >> >>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at _www.filmfan.com_ >>(http://www.filmfan.com/) >>___________________________________________________________________ >>How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List >>Send a message addressed to: [email protected] >>In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L >>The author of this message is solely responsible for its content. >> >>Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com >>___________________________________________________________________ >How to UNSUBSCRIBE from >>the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: >>[email protected] In the BODY of your message type: >SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this >>message is solely responsible for its content. Visit the MoPo >Mailing List >>Web Site at www.filmfan.com >>___________________________________________________________________ >How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a >>message addressed to: [email protected] In the BODY of >your >>message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely >responsible >>for its content. Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at >www.filmfan.com >>___________________________________________________________________ >How to >>UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: > >>[email protected] In the BODY of your message type: >SIGNOFF MOPO-L The >>author of this message is solely responsible for its content. >> >> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com >> >___________________________________________________________________ >> How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List >> >> Send a message addressed to: [email protected] >> In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L >> >> The author of this message is solely responsible for its content >. >> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com ___________________________________________________________________ How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message addressed to: [email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.
