after the poster was folded with the studio folds, it was  folded 
again...............hence 4 exta fold lines.   but these fold  lines have lots 
and 
lots of crumpling around them............
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 10/7/2011 6:44:55 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

how much in value could a $40 poster decrease?
 
was this insert folded in quarters as normal, and then folded in half  
again (about a 5" x 14" rectangle)?  is that how it got 4 extra  folds?
or are the extra folds just where it was originally folded and then  
sloppily folded back creating an extra?

----- Original Message ----- 
From:  _Michael  B_ (mailto:[email protected])  
To: [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])   
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 6:34  PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] 4 extra folds? 4 4  4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 extra 
undisclosed folds


when i first wrote, i thought people might comment about the  decrease in 
value due to 4 extra folds.
 
over the last year, i was outbid twice......once with a bidding  
war------on bruce's site for an insert.  i recall, the poster selling  at 
bruce's site 
for about 130 amd 180.   (and you know his  pictures are clear and he adds 
words when there are extra  folds)
 
a few months ago, an ebay seller...........very  honest------------listed 
the same insert for 69.99.  he disclosed 4  extra folds.  you can also see 
the folds in the images.  the  poster never sold at 69.99.  i would have 
grabbed it at that price, had  there been no extra folds.  the seller has 
re-listed the poster at a  very, very low start price.  KNOWING THE DEFECT, 
which 
the seller  disclosed both in words and photographs, this time will sell.  i 
will  be a bidder.  but i wouldn't want to bid, win, and then open a package 
 and be surprised.  
 
we bid based on condition.  when condition is not  disclosed, prices get 
inflated.
 
as to your questions rich------------i paid high for the  title......it did 
not sell for a long time.  so people believing it was  near mint as i did, 
dint think it was a good value.  now, with this  defect, it is worth a lot 
less...................  and seller is not  cooperating in the return.  i am 
about to just end it, take my  loss...........
 
michael 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 10/7/2011 6:18:05 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

John, I disagree

if a seller has mis-described or not  properly reported condition issues 
that should be noted if not visible,  then I believe (as I'm sure does Bruce, 
Sean and most dealers) that I  should be paying return shipping - unless 
some other deal was worked out  like a small discount, replacement etc.

the buyer might not have  bid as much or at all if the condition was 
properly described, so that  would on my head, not my customer's.

if a seller on ebay tells me  he won't accept returns for instance under 
any circumstances, I don't care  if he has a Double Indemnity 1 sheet up 
that's about to close for $1000.  I'm not bidding, because I'm not going to 
consider putting up with any  bullshyte

similarly, if the seller says I accept returns if I  incorrectly described, 
but you pay shipping and I will not refund your  other shipping either.. 
I'm telling that dealer to kiss my lily white a$$  and I'm taking my dollars 
elsewhere

If a buyer after receipt says  "Hey, you didn't do anything wrong, but I 
find that I don't like this  piece as much as I thought I might and I would 
like to return it", I  happily take return, but shipping in neither direction 
will be refunded. I  will not take any other action against the buyer. he 
may bid freely in the  future.

if the buyer after receipt says "you f*cking suck and I  want to return 
this".. well that gets back to the lily white  thingy

Rich

At 03:05 PM 10/7/2011, JOHN REID Vintage Movie  Memorabilia wrote:

Just another  point about this. The issue seems to be about whether the 
seller should  pay for return shipping. eBay actually requires all sellers to 
specify a  return policy and also to indicate who pays for the poster to be 
sent  back. Surely it should be just a case of checking the sellers policy  
which is clearly displayed in the listing. If the listing says that the  
seller won't pay for return shipping then they shouldnt be expected to  change 
their policy.

----- Original Message -----  

From:






_Richard Halegua Comic Art_ (mailto:[email protected])  

To: [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])   

Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2011 7:55 AM

Subject: Re: [MOPO] 4 extra folds? 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4  extra 
undisclosed folds


Michael


are you telling me that the dealer wouldn't pay for your shipping  cost


or 


that maybe he got irritated at you after your messages/MoPo and  told you 
to f*ck off?


or 


are you saying you feel you got a good enough price in buying it  that you 
don't want to return it?


It makes a world of difference which of these 3 situations is the  answer


if the latter is the case Michael, then I don't see why you say  you were 
"burnt" or that you will "take a hit"

if the latter is not the case, then something isn't right


Rich


At 02:42 PM 10/7/2011, Michael B wrote:


not at all.




it was never my intent to embarrass the  mega-dealer-seller.  my posting 
was merely to get the seller to  respond, if he were a MOPO member.  the 
picture of the poster  on ebay looks near mint....even hard to see the studio 
folds.   



i was burnt and disappointed in this transaction.........   



i repeat:  the picture of the poster on ebay looks  mint....even hard to 
see the studio folds.  ....no hint of  extra fold on the photo.......but 
offensive in person.   



looks like i will take a hit on this one, because when i sell  it, i will 
disclose the defects.



easy for those who don't get slapped to say to the other to turn  the other 
cheek.







michael





In a message dated 10/7/2011 4:56:57 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:  

Fascinating is all I can say.

This buyer who complained so loudly has now gone completely  silent and  
turned his mute button on. Why?

And with still no links to this incorrectly described (4 4 4  folded)  
poster, and no response to those that questioned, criticized  and  
commented on his premature outburst towards a seller who  was/is  
willing to work with him-- speaks volumes about this  individual's own  
integrity and transparency.

I see he also occasionally lists a number of posters for sale  on ebay,  
with every color in the rainbow used in the descriptive fonts  
(psychedelic trip?). Let's just hope that each and every flaw  on those  
posters have been accurately disclosed. I am willing to bet  that there  
are small imperfections that have not been seen and therefore,  not  
disclosed.

And if someone found an undisclosed flaw and wanted to return  a  
purchased poster to him, would this seller pay for return  shipping  
and/or take a price reduction decided by the unhappy  buyer?



-KL




On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Michael B  <[email protected]> wrote:  
> when a poster is "not as described" or has undisclosed  defects, it 
should be  
> the seller that paye the return postage?  
>  
> i am waiting for the seller to confirm this.  
>  
> i was happy to see that the seller read my posting on  MOPO, and 
responded,  
> but he needs to confirm that he will pay the return  postage.  
>  
> michael  
> Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at _www.filmfan.com_ 
(http://www.filmfan.com/)   
>  ___________________________________________________________________  How 
to  
> UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List Send a message  addressed to:  
> [email protected] In the BODY of your  message type: SIGNOFF 
 
> MOPO-L The author of this message is solely responsible  for its content.

Visit the  MoPo Mailing List Web Site at _www.filmfan.com_ 
(http://www.filmfan.com/)   
___________________________________________________________________   
How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List  

Send a message addressed  to: [email protected]  
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L  

The author of this message is solely  responsible for its content.




Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at _www.filmfan.com_ 
(http://www.filmfan.com/) 

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its  content. 
Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at _www.filmfan.com_ 
(http://www.filmfan.com/) 

___________________________________________________________________

How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

Send a message addressed to: [email protected]

In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its  content.


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at _www.filmfan.com_ 
(http://www.filmfan.com/) 
___________________________________________________________________
How  to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
Send a message addressed  to: [email protected]
In the BODY of your message type:  SIGNOFF MOPO-L
The author of this message is solely responsible for  its content.

Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com 
___________________________________________________________________ How to 
UNSUBSCRIBE from the 
MoPo Mailing List  Send a message addressed to: 
[email protected] In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L 
 The author of this 
message is solely responsible for its  content.

         Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___________________________________________________________________
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
       Send a message addressed to: [email protected]
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

Reply via email to