In a message dated 6/30/2001 12:44:23 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << He also wouldn't have repeated his actions if he was dead. The difference is that it would be considerably cheaper to execute him than to lock him up for life. Wouldn't that money be better spend funding hospitals or such? >> Nope. With the appeals process and court cases, keeping a prisoner alive is cheaper than executing him. And why do you say 'he wouldn't have repeated his actions?' Locked up or dead, there's no way he could have repeated his actions. Rasheed MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
- Re: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up Wim Nusselder
- RE: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up Gerhard Ersdal
- RE: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up N. Glen Dickey
- RE: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up Gerhard Ersdal
- Re: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up HisSheedness
- Re: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up HisSheedness
- RE: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up N. Glen Dickey
- Re: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up HisSheedness
- Re: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up HisSheedness
- Re: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up HisSheedness
- Re: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up Wim Nusselder
- Re: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up HisSheedness
- Re: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up HisSheedness
- RE: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up N. Glen Dickey
- Re: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up HisSheedness
- RE: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up N. Glen Dickey
- RE: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up Gerhard Ersdal
- Re: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up Wim Nusselder
- RE: MD Real Libertarians Please Stand Up N. Glen Dickey