In a message dated 6/30/2001 12:44:23 AM Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< 
 He also wouldn't have repeated his actions if he was dead. The difference is
 that it would be considerably cheaper to execute him than to lock him up for
 life. Wouldn't that money be better spend funding hospitals or such?
  >>

Nope.  With the appeals process and court cases, keeping a prisoner alive is 
cheaper than executing him.  And why do you say 'he wouldn't have repeated 
his actions?'  Locked up or dead, there's no way he could have repeated his 
actions.

Rasheed


MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Reply via email to